專升本英語(yǔ)考試閱讀理解專項(xiàng)練習(xí)

　　2022年各省專升本考試已經(jīng)結(jié)束，為了幫助考生能取得高分，下面好學(xué)校李老師給考生整理了專升本英語(yǔ)考試閱讀理解專項(xiàng)練習(xí)，考生在考前可先來練練手，爭(zhēng)取考出高分。

　　專升本英語(yǔ)考試閱讀理解專項(xiàng)練習(xí)

　　專項(xiàng)練習(xí)范文

　　There are two main changes comparing with the past. First, there are new definitions of what man can achieve, of what a human standard of life should be. In recent times this has been particularly true since technology has consistently broadened man's potential, it has made a longer, healthier, better life possible. Thus, in terms of what is technically possible, we have higher aspirations. Those who suffer levels of life well below those that are possible, even though they live better than medieval knights(中世紀(jì)騎士) or Asian peasants, are poor.

　　Related to this technological advance is the social definition of poverty. The American rich in Hong Kong or in the sixteenth century are poor here and now in the United States. They are dispossessed in terms of what the rest of the nations enjoy, in terms of what the society could provide if it had the will. They live on the fringe, the margin. They watch the movies and read the magazines of affluent (豐富的)American, and these will tell them that they are internal exiles.

　　And finally, one of the reasons that the income figures show fewer people today with low incomes than 20 years ago is that more wives are working now, and family income has risen as a result. In 1940, 15% of wives were in the labor force ;in 1957 the figure was 30%. This means that there was more money and, presumably, less poverty. Yet a tremendous growth in the number of the impoverishment of home life, of children who receive less care, love, and supervision. This one fact, for instance, might well play a significant role in the problems of the young in America. It could mean that we have made an improvement in income statistics at the cost of hurting thousands and thousands of children. If a person has money but achieves this through mortgaging the future, who is to say that he or she is no longer poor?

　　題目

　　1. In recent times, as far as technology is concerned, those who are poor .

　　A. live better than Asian peasants

　　B. lead better lives than medieval knights

　　C. cannot achieve the living standard that technology can make

　　D. have no aspiration

　　2. In the second paragraphthey are internal exiles" implies .

　　A. their internal feelings are different from the rest of nation

　　B. they are discriminated by the rest of the nation

　　C. they are excessively lonely than people in other countries

　　D. they can't enjoy what the rest of the nation do concerning what the society provides

　　3. The so-called American poor can only be defined by .

　　A. technology

　　B. American social background

　　C. the living standard in the U. S.

　　D. the living standard of Hong Kong

　　4. More women are working in America, which means .

　　A. improvement of all aspects of people's lives

　　B. fewer people are poor in the U. S. today

　　C. the nation's economy grows rapidly

　　D. the rising of family incomes

　　5. Which of the following sentences best describes the last paragraph?

　　A. Women are playing a less important role in educating children.

　　B. It's really unnecessary for women to work.

　　C. Improvement in income at the cost of the happiness of children doesn't mean rich.

　　D. Problems of the young will be solved if women do not work.

　　參考答案

　　1. 【精析】C。事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題。C選項(xiàng)所表達(dá)的意思與第一段最后一句中的u ... suffer levels of life well below those that are possible”一致，故選C。A、B雖然正確，但不是就技術(shù)而言的，所以排除;D為干擾項(xiàng),原文第 四句中出現(xiàn)了“we have higher aspiration”，但這里的we是一個(gè)寬泛的概念，不是只針對(duì)富人或窮人而言的，跟題 干所問的不相干。

　　2. 【精析】D。詞義理解題。將線索定位在第二段最后一句中的“they are internal exiles”就可以得出D 項(xiàng)正確。A、B是根據(jù)internal exiles的字面意思得出的錯(cuò)誤理解;C是對(duì)exile的錯(cuò)誤理解。

　　3. 【精析】C。事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題。從文章第一段最后一句及第二段可知,美國(guó)所謂的窮人是以美國(guó)本身的生 活水平來劃分的。第二段第一句“對(duì)于貧窮的社會(huì)定義是和這種科技進(jìn)步聯(lián)系在一起的”，這里講的是定義 “貧窮，，時(shí)需要考慮到科技進(jìn)步的因素，因此科技只是影響，，貧窮”的一個(gè)因素而不是決定因素，所以排除A;B 項(xiàng)從字面上看講得通，但文中未提到社會(huì)背景方面的內(nèi)容,而且生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn)僅是社會(huì)背景的一個(gè)方面;D項(xiàng)“香港 的生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”顯然不對(duì)。

　　4. 【精析】D。事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)文章第三段第一句:婦女參加工作的結(jié)果是家庭收入增加可知答案應(yīng) 選D。A項(xiàng)是說人民生活各個(gè)方面的提高，與原文內(nèi)容不符;選項(xiàng)B中的poor沒有具體交代是哪一方面，在一 個(gè)國(guó)家的不同時(shí)期，是否“貧窮”的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是不同的，更多婦女參加工作，家庭收入增加，木能直接得出貧窮人口 更少的結(jié)論;C項(xiàng)原文未提及。

　　5. 【精析】C。主旨大意題。第三段中說婦女參加工作使得家庭收入增加,但卻以傷害成千上萬(wàn)兒童的 幸福為代價(jià)。最后一句是對(duì)該段的總結(jié)，也為該段的主旨,與選項(xiàng)C相符。A項(xiàng)這一說法本身正確，但不全面; B“婦女有沒有必要出去工作”和D“如果婦女不工作就可以解決孩子的問題”原文未提及。

　　全文翻譯

　　與過去相比,有兩個(gè)主要的變化。第一,一個(gè)人能夠做到什么、應(yīng)該擁有的生活標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有了新的定義。在最 近，因?yàn)榧夹g(shù)的發(fā)展拓寬了人的潛力使得這一切變得格外真實(shí),它可能使人們更長(zhǎng)壽、更健康、更好地生活。因 此,由于技術(shù)上的可行性，我們擁有了更高層次的愿望。，那些實(shí)際生活水平低于他們可能達(dá)到的生活水平的人 們是貧窮的，即使他們生活得比中世紀(jì)的騎士或亞洲農(nóng)民要好。

　　與技術(shù)進(jìn)步相關(guān)的是社會(huì)對(duì)于貧窮的定義。在香港或在十六世紀(jì)富裕的美國(guó)人在現(xiàn)在的美國(guó)屬于窮人。 相對(duì)國(guó)家其余的人所享有的財(cái)富以及假如社會(huì)愿意時(shí)所能提供的財(cái)富而言，他們是貧窮的。他們生活在美國(guó) 的邊緣。他們觀看富裕的美國(guó)人的電影和閱讀他們的雜志，這些只能告訴他們，他們都是內(nèi)地的流放者。

　　最后，收入統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)顯示，與20年前相比低收入者越來越少的其中一個(gè)原因是現(xiàn)在越來越多的妻子也在 工作，促使了家庭收入的上漲。在1940年,15%的妻子在工作,1957年這一數(shù)字為30%。這意味著人們有更多 的錢,據(jù)推測(cè)貧困可能減少，但是家庭生活貧困的數(shù)目卻在大量增加，兒童更加缺乏關(guān)心、愛護(hù)和監(jiān)管。這一事 實(shí)可能在美國(guó)年輕人的問題中起了重要的作用。這可能意味著，我們?cè)谑杖霐?shù)字上得到了提高,但卻以傷害成 千上萬(wàn)的孩子為代價(jià)。如果一個(gè)人的錢是通過透支未來而獲得的，誰(shuí)能說他或她不再是貧窮的呢?